Wiley; 2003. . In the submission cover letter, please provide details about other published or submitted papers having substantial overlap (including data sets) with the new CD . Manuscript Preparation. A decision requires further reviews. Also, a statement that no ghost writing by anyone not named on the author list must be included (see Editorial in Movement Disorders 2005;20:1536). assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor - there is no separate system status to indicate this). You may also choose to state whether you opt in or out of the post-revision review too. [CDATA[// > Introduction. 7, 12, 16, 18, 20, 21, 25, 27 Ten of 17 studies had a comparison group versus infants under age 12 months. If the initial reviews are conflicting, The manuscript shall be accepted as it is. The MDPI Editorial Process. Wiley coyote under rock. You should also consider whether there is any in-built bias not nullified by the control experiments. Give positive feedback first. Chapter one is called The Idea of the World because it reflects the meaning of the efforts of the ancient's philosophers-geographers to know the shape and size of the Earth, discover its position in space, and find out what is around them. Current treatments are designed to alleviate the pain by either using . Your review should ultimately help the author improve their article. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. Wiley and the ASBMR support efforts to encourage the sharing of research data. What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? The editors will take this list into consideration but may invite other experts if your article is selected for peer review. A 2010 study of nursing journals found that 79% of recommendations by reviewers were influenced by grammar and writing style (Shattel, et al., 2010). Of course, you may still decide to reject it following a second reading. m.white@us.nature.com To: Paul.Bierman@uvm.edu Reply-To: m.white@us.nature.com Decision on Nature manuscript . Clearly, authors can only do this by referencing recent literature. when did they get back to you ? on 29 Oct, 2015, Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it is assigned to a handling editor who conducts an initial screening of the paper to see if it meets the basic requirements of the journal. Both are very repetitive indexing agencies. "When the comments seem really positive, but the recommendation is rejectionit puts the editor in a tough position of having to reject a paper when the comments make it sound like a great paper." How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? It has been like that for a few days without any email notification.